Error free data? No review memo questions? Is this possible?

Author: NASCSP
Level: Intermediate
Webinar time: 3 hours

Write your awesome label here.

Course overview

CAAs have long engaged in a multi-step process of vetting their CSBG Annual Report data typically beginning internally at the agency, then with their state office, and finally with the federal office before the data can be finalized. After all that, many CAAs receive a dreaded review memo asking yet more questions. The CSBG Annual Report review process should ensure that data is error free, accurate, and complete. Come hear NASCSP talk about strategies to reduce your review burden, minimize federal review questions, and ensure your data is correct and accurate.

Video time: Part 1 - 90 Minutes, Part 2 - 90 Minutes

About NASCSP

The National Association for State Community Services Programs (NASCSP) is the sole national association charged with advocating and enhancing the leadership role of States in the administration of the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) and Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP).

The NASCSP vision calls for the empowerment of individuals and families with low-incomes. NASCSP helps States attain full utilization of resources to implement an extensive array of services to individuals and families.

Who we are

The Virginia Community Action Partnership and the Virginia Office of Economic Opportunity works together to provide all Virginia Community Action Agencies with the training and technical assistance needed to be successful. We aim to provide training for all levels of staff at an agency and board members.

Featured links

This website is supported by Grant Number 2501VACOSR from the Community Services Block Grant within the Administration for Children and Families, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Neither the Administration for Children and Families nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse this website (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Administration for Children and Families and the [ACF Office/Program].